Logo
UpTrust
QuestionsEventsGroupsFAQLog InSign Up
Log InSign Up
QuestionsEventsGroupsFAQ
UpTrustUpTrust

Social media built on trust and credibility. Where thoughtful contributions rise to the top.

Get Started

Sign UpLog In

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceDMCA
© 2026 UpTrust. All rights reserved.

us elections

  • J

    Asking my 4 year old which candidate would be a better leader. She pointed to Vance and I asked her why, and she said because he’s better at talking! He’s saying I’m the person who can be the leader!.

    Joanna•...

    Her take on Kamala vs Trump was preferring Kamala because she’s a girl.

    gender studies
    politics
    us elections
    Comments
    0
  • J

    Vance affect. His affect seems like Listen, children. A bit of disgust. Gives me ick get this opponent [Walz] away. But then Watz, by constrast, doesn’t seem like a kid to me, he seems earnest.

    What’s Walz’s vibe… Annoyed. A little hurt. I guess I feel a little more sorry for him more than want to follow him.

    I think Kamala had a better contrasting vibe to Trump’s vibe in the first presidential debate.

    Joanna•...
    When I watched the first debate with Trump and Biden, Biden had a face when Trump was speaking that seemed like "oh god" – a slightly hurt, confused face. I thought it seem weaker than Kamala who.. I don’t remember her listening face exactly, but maybe "amused and dismissive"?...
    politics
    us elections
    debates
    Comments
    0
  • annabeth avatar

    Could it be ethically ok to not vote? note: I posted this two hours before Biden stepped down. It’s possible that a different Dem candidate could change my choices, but my overall perspective feels the same.

    A lot of people I’m close to have very strong opinions that to not vote in this presidential election is wrong. But I have no interest in voting. It genuinely seems to me that things will be perfectly not ideal no matter what happens in the election.

    My best guess of what’s happening culturally is that the mean green meme has gotten really far down its negative feedback loop, and red, orange, and amber are swarming on the attack. If that’s right, a breaking point of sorts will have to be hit for teal to get to its tipping point. In 12-step terms, green would have to hit rock bottom to be able to finally admit it has a problem and needs help.

    I wouldn’t be surprised if teal’s tipping point would have to be particularly intense because it’s also the tipping point into second tier, and we have no historical reference for what it takes for a culture to begin to get a foothold in a new tier (the big bang, the formulation of simple cells, and the leap from apes to humans might be comparable but difficult to translate…)

    This thought process just leaves me trusting what’s happening, and voting just doesn’t feel like one of the ways I want to participate in this happening.

    david•...
    Absolutely it is ethical. In fact, I’d argue that voting when one knows they are actually voting against another candidate is the less ethical behavior....
    ethics
    political science
    logic
    us elections
    voting systems
    Comments
    0
Loading related tags...